J'ai réalisé une petite suite de tests pour toutes les solutions conformes. J'ai dû modifier légèrement les fonctions pour qu'elles fonctionnent avec Python 3. Il est intéressant de noter que la fonction la plus rapide de PyPy est la plus lente de Python 2/3 dans certains cas.
import itertools
import time
from collections import OrderedDict
def tokland_org(lst, n):
if not lst:
yield []
else:
for group in (((lst[0],) + xs) for xs in itertools.combinations(lst[1:], n-1)):
for groups in tokland_org([x for x in lst if x not in group], n):
yield [group] + groups
tokland = lambda x: tokland_org(x, 2)
def gatoatigrado(lst):
N = len(lst)
choice_indices = itertools.product(*[
range(k) for k in reversed(range(1, N, 2)) ])
for choice in choice_indices:
# calculate the list corresponding to the choices
tmp = list(lst)
result = []
for index in choice:
result.append( (tmp.pop(0), tmp.pop(index)) )
yield result
def shang(X):
lst = list(X)
if len(lst) < 2:
yield lst
return
a = lst[0]
for i in range(1,len(lst)):
pair = (a,lst[i])
for rest in shang(lst[1:i]+lst[i+1:]):
yield [pair] + rest
def smichr(X):
lst = list(X)
if not lst:
yield [tuple()]
elif len(lst) == 1:
yield [tuple(lst)]
elif len(lst) == 2:
yield [tuple(lst)]
else:
if len(lst) % 2:
for i in (None, True):
if i not in lst:
lst = lst + [i]
PAD = i
break
else:
while chr(i) in lst:
i += 1
PAD = chr(i)
lst = lst + [PAD]
else:
PAD = False
a = lst[0]
for i in range(1, len(lst)):
pair = (a, lst[i])
for rest in smichr(lst[1:i] + lst[i+1:]):
rv = [pair] + rest
if PAD is not False:
for i, t in enumerate(rv):
if PAD in t:
rv[i] = (t[0],)
break
yield rv
def adeel_zafar(X):
L = list(X)
if len(L) == 2:
yield [(L[0], L[1])]
else:
first = L.pop(0)
for i, e in enumerate(L):
second = L.pop(i)
for list_of_pairs in adeel_zafar(L):
list_of_pairs.insert(0, (first, second))
yield list_of_pairs
L.insert(i, second)
L.insert(0, first)
if __name__ =="__main__":
import timeit
import pprint
candidates = dict(tokland=tokland, gatoatigrado=gatoatigrado, shang=shang, smichr=smichr, adeel_zafar=adeel_zafar)
for i in range(1,7):
results = [ frozenset([frozenset(x) for x in candidate(range(i*2))]) for candidate in candidates.values() ]
assert len(frozenset(results)) == 1
print("Times for getting all permutations of sets of unordered pairs consisting of two draws from a 6-element deck until it is empty")
times = dict([(k, timeit.timeit('list({0}(range(6)))'.format(k), setup="from __main__ import {0}".format(k), number=10000)) for k in candidates.keys()])
pprint.pprint([(k, "{0:.3g}".format(v)) for k,v in OrderedDict(sorted(times.items(), key=lambda t: t[1])).items()])
print("Times for getting the first 2000 permutations of sets of unordered pairs consisting of two draws from a 52-element deck until it is empty")
times = dict([(k, timeit.timeit('list(islice({0}(range(52)), 800))'.format(k), setup="from itertools import islice; from __main__ import {0}".format(k), number=100)) for k in candidates.keys()])
pprint.pprint([(k, "{0:.3g}".format(v)) for k,v in OrderedDict(sorted(times.items(), key=lambda t: t[1])).items()])
"""
print("The 10000th permutations of the previous series:")
gens = dict([(k,v(range(52))) for k,v in candidates.items()])
tenthousands = dict([(k, list(itertools.islice(permutations, 10000))[-1]) for k,permutations in gens.items()])
for pair in tenthousands.items():
print(pair[0])
print(pair[1])
"""
Ils semblent tous générer exactement le même ordre, de sorte que les ensembles ne sont pas nécessaires, mais de cette façon, c'est à l'épreuve du temps. J'ai expérimenté un peu avec la conversion de Python 3, il n'est pas toujours évident de savoir où construire la liste, mais j'ai essayé quelques alternatives et j'ai choisi la plus rapide.
Voici les résultats de l'analyse comparative :
% echo "pypy"; pypy all_pairs.py; echo "python2"; python all_pairs.py; echo "python3"; python3 all_pairs.py
pypy
Times for getting all permutations of sets of unordered pairs consisting of two draws from a 6-element deck until it is empty
[('gatoatigrado', '0.0626'),
('adeel_zafar', '0.125'),
('smichr', '0.149'),
('shang', '0.2'),
('tokland', '0.27')]
Times for getting the first 2000 permutations of sets of unordered pairs consisting of two draws from a 52-element deck until it is empty
[('gatoatigrado', '0.29'),
('adeel_zafar', '0.411'),
('smichr', '0.464'),
('shang', '0.493'),
('tokland', '0.553')]
python2
Times for getting all permutations of sets of unordered pairs consisting of two draws from a 6-element deck until it is empty
[('gatoatigrado', '0.344'),
('adeel_zafar', '0.374'),
('smichr', '0.396'),
('shang', '0.495'),
('tokland', '0.675')]
Times for getting the first 2000 permutations of sets of unordered pairs consisting of two draws from a 52-element deck until it is empty
[('adeel_zafar', '0.773'),
('shang', '0.823'),
('smichr', '0.841'),
('tokland', '0.948'),
('gatoatigrado', '1.38')]
python3
Times for getting all permutations of sets of unordered pairs consisting of two draws from a 6-element deck until it is empty
[('gatoatigrado', '0.385'),
('adeel_zafar', '0.419'),
('smichr', '0.433'),
('shang', '0.562'),
('tokland', '0.837')]
Times for getting the first 2000 permutations of sets of unordered pairs consisting of two draws from a 52-element deck until it is empty
[('smichr', '0.783'),
('shang', '0.81'),
('adeel_zafar', '0.835'),
('tokland', '0.969'),
('gatoatigrado', '1.3')]
% pypy --version
Python 2.7.12 (5.6.0+dfsg-0~ppa2~ubuntu16.04, Nov 11 2016, 16:31:26)
[PyPy 5.6.0 with GCC 5.4.0 20160609]
% python3 --version
Python 3.5.2
Je propose donc d'opter pour la solution de gatoatigrado.
