À l'aide de la publicité pour votre authentification est une excellente idée, car vous avez besoin d'ajouter tout le monde de toute façon, et pour les utilisateurs de l'intranet il n'y a pas besoin d'un supplément de connexion.
Vous avez raison que ASP.NET vous permet d'utiliser un Fournisseur qui vous permettra de vous authentifier à l'encontre de la ma, mais il n'y a rien inclus pour vous donner l'appartenance à un groupe de soutien (même si c'est assez trivial à mettre en œuvre si vous voulez, je peux fournir un échantillon).
La vraie question ici est de savoir si vous souhaitez utiliser des groupes d'ANNONCES pour définir des autorisations à l'intérieur de chaque application, oui?
Si oui, alors vous avez la possibilité de créer votre propre RoleProvider pour ASP.NET qui peut également être utilisé par les WinForms et WPF applications par l'intermédiaire de ApplicationServices. Cette RoleProvider pourrait établir un lien entre l'ID de l'utilisateur dans l'AD pour les groupes et les rôles de chaque application que vous pouvez stocker dans votre propre base de données, ce qui permet à chaque application pour permettre à l'administration de ces rôles sans exiger de ces admins pour avoir plus de privilèges dans l'AD.
Si vous le souhaitez, vous pouvez également remplacer et de les combiner application de rôles avec des groupes d'ANNONCES, donc, si ils sont dans certaines régions du globe "Admin" groupe ANNONCE qu'ils obtiennent la permission de l'Application indépendamment de l'Application de l'appartenance de rôle. Inversement, si ils ont un groupe ou bien en AD-à-dire qu'ils ont été tiré, vous pouvez ignorer toutes les applications de l'appartenance de rôle et de restreindre l'accès (depuis RH ne serait probablement pas les supprimer à partir de chaque application, en supposant qu'ils savent même pas sur tous!!!).
Exemple de code ajoutée, à la demande:
NOTE: sur la base de ce travail original http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/28546/Active-Directory-Roles-Provider
Pour votre ActiveDirectoryMembershipProvider vous avez seulement besoin de mettre en œuvre la méthode ValidateUser, bien que vous pourriez mettre en œuvre plus si vous le souhaitez, la nouvelle AccountManagement de noms qui rend cette triviale:
// assumes: using System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement;
public override bool ValidateUser( string username, string password )
{
bool result = false;
try
{
using( var context =
new PrincipalContext( ContextType.Domain, "yourDomainName" ) )
{
result = context.ValidateCredentials( username, password );
}
}
catch( Exception ex )
{
// TODO: log exception
}
return result;
}
Pour votre fournisseur de rôle c'est un peu plus de travail, il ya quelques questions clés que nous avons découvert en cherchant sur google, comme les groupes que vous souhaitez exclure, les utilisateurs que vous souhaitez exclure etc.
Il vaut probablement un article complet, mais cela devrait vous aider à obtenir commencé, c'est la mise en cache des recherches dans des variables de Session, comme un exemple de la façon dont vous pourriez améliorer les performances (depuis un Cache complet de l'échantillon serait trop long).
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Collections.Specialized;
using System.Configuration.Provider;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.DirectoryServices;
using System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement;
using System.Linq;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Hosting;
using System.Web.Security;
namespace MyApp.Security
{
public sealed class ActiveDirectoryRoleProvider : RoleProvider
{
private const string AD_FILTER = "(&(objectCategory=group)(|(groupType=-2147483646)(groupType=-2147483644)(groupType=-2147483640)))";
private const string AD_FIELD = "samAccountName";
private string _activeDirectoryConnectionString;
private string _domain;
// Retrieve Group Mode
// "Additive" indicates that only the groups specified in groupsToUse will be used
// "Subtractive" indicates that all Active Directory groups will be used except those specified in groupsToIgnore
// "Additive" is somewhat more secure, but requires more maintenance when groups change
private bool _isAdditiveGroupMode;
private List<string> _groupsToUse;
private List<string> _groupsToIgnore;
private List<string> _usersToIgnore;
#region Ignore Lists
// IMPORTANT - DEFAULT LIST OF ACTIVE DIRECTORY USERS TO "IGNORE"
// DO NOT REMOVE ANY OF THESE UNLESS YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THE SECURITY IMPLICATIONS
// VERYIFY THAT ALL CRITICAL USERS ARE IGNORED DURING TESTING
private String[] _DefaultUsersToIgnore = new String[]
{
"Administrator", "TsInternetUser", "Guest", "krbtgt", "Replicate", "SERVICE", "SMSService"
};
// IMPORTANT - DEFAULT LIST OF ACTIVE DIRECTORY DOMAIN GROUPS TO "IGNORE"
// PREVENTS ENUMERATION OF CRITICAL DOMAIN GROUP MEMBERSHIP
// DO NOT REMOVE ANY OF THESE UNLESS YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THE SECURITY IMPLICATIONS
// VERIFY THAT ALL CRITICAL GROUPS ARE IGNORED DURING TESTING BY CALLING GetAllRoles MANUALLY
private String[] _defaultGroupsToIgnore = new String[]
{
"Domain Guests", "Domain Computers", "Group Policy Creator Owners", "Guests", "Users",
"Domain Users", "Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access", "Exchange Domain Servers", "Schema Admins",
"Enterprise Admins", "Domain Admins", "Cert Publishers", "Backup Operators", "Account Operators",
"Server Operators", "Print Operators", "Replicator", "Domain Controllers", "WINS Users",
"DnsAdmins", "DnsUpdateProxy", "DHCP Users", "DHCP Administrators", "Exchange Services",
"Exchange Enterprise Servers", "Remote Desktop Users", "Network Configuration Operators",
"Incoming Forest Trust Builders", "Performance Monitor Users", "Performance Log Users",
"Windows Authorization Access Group", "Terminal Server License Servers", "Distributed COM Users",
"Administrators", "Everybody", "RAS and IAS Servers", "MTS Trusted Impersonators",
"MTS Impersonators", "Everyone", "LOCAL", "Authenticated Users"
};
#endregion
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the ADRoleProvider class.
/// </summary>
public ActiveDirectoryRoleProvider()
{
_groupsToUse = new List<string>();
_groupsToIgnore = new List<string>();
_usersToIgnore = new List<string>();
}
public override String ApplicationName { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Initialize ADRoleProvider with config values
/// </summary>
/// <param name="name"></param>
/// <param name="config"></param>
public override void Initialize( String name, NameValueCollection config )
{
if ( config == null )
throw new ArgumentNullException( "config" );
if ( String.IsNullOrEmpty( name ) )
name = "ADRoleProvider";
if ( String.IsNullOrEmpty( config[ "description" ] ) )
{
config.Remove( "description" );
config.Add( "description", "Active Directory Role Provider" );
}
// Initialize the abstract base class.
base.Initialize( name, config );
_domain = ReadConfig( config, "domain" );
_isAdditiveGroupMode = ( ReadConfig( config, "groupMode" ) == "Additive" );
_activeDirectoryConnectionString = ReadConfig( config, "connectionString" );
DetermineApplicationName( config );
PopulateLists( config );
}
private string ReadConfig( NameValueCollection config, string key )
{
if ( config.AllKeys.Any( k => k == key ) )
return config[ key ];
throw new ProviderException( "Configuration value required for key: " + key );
}
private void DetermineApplicationName( NameValueCollection config )
{
// Retrieve Application Name
ApplicationName = config[ "applicationName" ];
if ( String.IsNullOrEmpty( ApplicationName ) )
{
try
{
string app =
HostingEnvironment.ApplicationVirtualPath ??
Process.GetCurrentProcess().MainModule.ModuleName.Split( '.' ).FirstOrDefault();
ApplicationName = app != "" ? app : "/";
}
catch
{
ApplicationName = "/";
}
}
if ( ApplicationName.Length > 256 )
throw new ProviderException( "The application name is too long." );
}
private void PopulateLists( NameValueCollection config )
{
// If Additive group mode, populate GroupsToUse with specified AD groups
if ( _isAdditiveGroupMode && !String.IsNullOrEmpty( config[ "groupsToUse" ] ) )
_groupsToUse.AddRange(
config[ "groupsToUse" ].Split( ',' ).Select( group => group.Trim() )
);
// Populate GroupsToIgnore List<string> with AD groups that should be ignored for roles purposes
_groupsToIgnore.AddRange(
_defaultGroupsToIgnore.Select( group => group.Trim() )
);
_groupsToIgnore.AddRange(
( config[ "groupsToIgnore" ] ?? "" ).Split( ',' ).Select( group => group.Trim() )
);
// Populate UsersToIgnore ArrayList with AD users that should be ignored for roles purposes
string usersToIgnore = config[ "usersToIgnore" ] ?? "";
_usersToIgnore.AddRange(
_DefaultUsersToIgnore
.Select( value => value.Trim() )
.Union(
usersToIgnore
.Split( new[] { "," }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries )
.Select( value => value.Trim() )
)
);
}
private void RecurseGroup( PrincipalContext context, string group, List<string> groups )
{
var principal = GroupPrincipal.FindByIdentity( context, IdentityType.SamAccountName, group );
if ( principal == null )
return;
List<string> res =
principal
.GetGroups()
.ToList()
.Select( grp => grp.Name )
.ToList();
groups.AddRange( res.Except( groups ) );
foreach ( var item in res )
RecurseGroup( context, item, groups );
}
/// <summary>
/// Retrieve listing of all roles to which a specified user belongs.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="username"></param>
/// <returns>String array of roles</returns>
public override string[] GetRolesForUser( string username )
{
string sessionKey = "groupsForUser:" + username;
if ( HttpContext.Current != null &&
HttpContext.Current.Session != null &&
HttpContext.Current.Session[ sessionKey ] != null
)
return ( (List<string>) ( HttpContext.Current.Session[ sessionKey ] ) ).ToArray();
using ( PrincipalContext context = new PrincipalContext( ContextType.Domain, _domain ) )
{
try
{
// add the users groups to the result
var groupList =
UserPrincipal
.FindByIdentity( context, IdentityType.SamAccountName, username )
.GetGroups()
.Select( group => group.Name )
.ToList();
// add each groups sub groups into the groupList
foreach ( var group in new List<string>( groupList ) )
RecurseGroup( context, group, groupList );
groupList = groupList.Except( _groupsToIgnore ).ToList();
if ( _isAdditiveGroupMode )
groupList = groupList.Join( _groupsToUse, r => r, g => g, ( r, g ) => r ).ToList();
if ( HttpContext.Current != null )
HttpContext.Current.Session[ sessionKey ] = groupList;
return groupList.ToArray();
}
catch ( Exception ex )
{
// TODO: LogError( "Unable to query Active Directory.", ex );
return new[] { "" };
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Retrieve listing of all users in a specified role.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="rolename">String array of users</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public override string[] GetUsersInRole( String rolename )
{
if ( !RoleExists( rolename ) )
throw new ProviderException( String.Format( "The role '{0}' was not found.", rolename ) );
using ( PrincipalContext context = new PrincipalContext( ContextType.Domain, _domain ) )
{
try
{
GroupPrincipal p = GroupPrincipal.FindByIdentity( context, IdentityType.SamAccountName, rolename );
return (
from user in p.GetMembers( true )
where !_usersToIgnore.Contains( user.SamAccountName )
select user.SamAccountName
).ToArray();
}
catch ( Exception ex )
{
// TODO: LogError( "Unable to query Active Directory.", ex );
return new[] { "" };
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Determine if a specified user is in a specified role.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="username"></param>
/// <param name="rolename"></param>
/// <returns>Boolean indicating membership</returns>
public override bool IsUserInRole( string username, string rolename )
{
return GetUsersInRole( rolename ).Any( user => user == username );
}
/// <summary>
/// Retrieve listing of all roles.
/// </summary>
/// <returns>String array of roles</returns>
public override string[] GetAllRoles()
{
string[] roles = ADSearch( _activeDirectoryConnectionString, AD_FILTER, AD_FIELD );
return (
from role in roles.Except( _groupsToIgnore )
where !_isAdditiveGroupMode || _groupsToUse.Contains( role )
select role
).ToArray();
}
/// <summary>
/// Determine if given role exists
/// </summary>
/// <param name="rolename">Role to check</param>
/// <returns>Boolean indicating existence of role</returns>
public override bool RoleExists( string rolename )
{
return GetAllRoles().Any( role => role == rolename );
}
/// <summary>
/// Return sorted list of usernames like usernameToMatch in rolename
/// </summary>
/// <param name="rolename">Role to check</param>
/// <param name="usernameToMatch">Partial username to check</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public override string[] FindUsersInRole( string rolename, string usernameToMatch )
{
if ( !RoleExists( rolename ) )
throw new ProviderException( String.Format( "The role '{0}' was not found.", rolename ) );
return (
from user in GetUsersInRole( rolename )
where user.ToLower().Contains( usernameToMatch.ToLower() )
select user
).ToArray();
}
#region Non Supported Base Class Functions
/// <summary>
/// AddUsersToRoles not supported. For security and management purposes, ADRoleProvider only supports read operations against Active Direcory.
/// </summary>
public override void AddUsersToRoles( string[] usernames, string[] rolenames )
{
throw new NotSupportedException( "Unable to add users to roles. For security and management purposes, ADRoleProvider only supports read operations against Active Direcory." );
}
/// <summary>
/// CreateRole not supported. For security and management purposes, ADRoleProvider only supports read operations against Active Direcory.
/// </summary>
public override void CreateRole( string rolename )
{
throw new NotSupportedException( "Unable to create new role. For security and management purposes, ADRoleProvider only supports read operations against Active Direcory." );
}
/// <summary>
/// DeleteRole not supported. For security and management purposes, ADRoleProvider only supports read operations against Active Direcory.
/// </summary>
public override bool DeleteRole( string rolename, bool throwOnPopulatedRole )
{
throw new NotSupportedException( "Unable to delete role. For security and management purposes, ADRoleProvider only supports read operations against Active Direcory." );
}
/// <summary>
/// RemoveUsersFromRoles not supported. For security and management purposes, ADRoleProvider only supports read operations against Active Direcory.
/// </summary>
public override void RemoveUsersFromRoles( string[] usernames, string[] rolenames )
{
throw new NotSupportedException( "Unable to remove users from roles. For security and management purposes, ADRoleProvider only supports read operations against Active Direcory." );
}
#endregion
/// <summary>
/// Performs an extremely constrained query against Active Directory. Requests only a single value from
/// AD based upon the filtering parameter to minimize performance hit from large queries.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="ConnectionString">Active Directory Connection String</param>
/// <param name="filter">LDAP format search filter</param>
/// <param name="field">AD field to return</param>
/// <returns>String array containing values specified by 'field' parameter</returns>
private String[] ADSearch( String ConnectionString, String filter, String field )
{
DirectorySearcher searcher = new DirectorySearcher
{
SearchRoot = new DirectoryEntry( ConnectionString ),
Filter = filter,
PageSize = 500
};
searcher.PropertiesToLoad.Clear();
searcher.PropertiesToLoad.Add( field );
try
{
using ( SearchResultCollection results = searcher.FindAll() )
{
List<string> r = new List<string>();
foreach ( SearchResult searchResult in results )
{
var prop = searchResult.Properties[ field ];
for ( int index = 0; index < prop.Count; index++ )
r.Add( prop[ index ].ToString() );
}
return r.Count > 0 ? r.ToArray() : new string[ 0 ];
}
}
catch ( Exception ex )
{
throw new ProviderException( "Unable to query Active Directory.", ex );
}
}
}
}
Un exemple de config sous-section d'entrée pour ce serait comme suit:
<roleManager enabled="true" defaultProvider="ActiveDirectory">
<providers>
<clear/>
<add
applicationName="MyApp" name="ActiveDirectory"
type="MyApp.Security.ActiveDirectoryRoleProvider"
domain="mydomain" groupMode="" connectionString="LDAP://myDirectoryServer.local/dc=mydomain,dc=local"
/>
</providers>
</roleManager>
Ouf, c'est beaucoup de code!
PS: éléments de Base du Fournisseur de Rôle ci-dessus sont basées sur les travaux d'autres personnes, je n'ai pas le lien portée de main, mais nous avons trouvé via Google, de sorte que partielles de crédit à cette personne pour l'original. Nous avons modifié fortement d'utiliser LINQ et de se débarrasser de la nécessité d'une base de données pour la mise en cache.